You plan a large SD-WAN deployment for a global company. You want to divide the network architecture into five geographical regions and install two hubs in each region for increased redundancy. You expect a significant amount of traffic within each region and limited traffic flow between spokes in different regions. You plan to connect the small branch sites to only the closest hub in their regions and the large branch sites to the two hubs in the regions. Which statement about your plan is true? (Choose one answer)

A. It is possible. You should use EBGP as the routing protocol between the regions.
B. It is not possible. FortiOS 7.6 supports multihub topologies with up to four hubs.
C. It is possible. You should use FortiManager and the overlay orchestrator multihub topology to simplify the deployment.
D. It is not possible. In a region, all spokes must have either single-hub or dual-hub connectivity.

Correct Answer: A

Brave-Dump Clients Votes

A 100%

Comments

Brave-Dumps Admin 2025-10-26 17:57:15

Selected Answers: A

Your plan is valid. In multiregion SD-WAN designs, Fortinet recommends BGP with EBGP peering between hubs across regions (and IBGP within each region). This matches your five-region, dual-hub layout. Ref: SD-WAN 7.6 Enterprise Admin Study Guide, pp.151–152 ; SD-WAN 7.4 Architect Study Guide, pp.320–321 .

What do you think?

FortiXpert 2025-11-01 06:29:05

Selected Answers: A

https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.2.0/sd-wan-architecture-for-enterprise/384078/using-ebgp-between-regions-with-intra-region-advpn